Julian Onken vs Ayoub Benamar Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Onken 1 - 0 Benamar

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Onken has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Benamar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Onken, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Benamar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Onken has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Benamar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Onken has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 1/ 2), with Benamar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Onken has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 110/ 79), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Benamar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 24/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 24/ 23).
• Player level: In the last year, Onken has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2), where as Benamar has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Onken winning 1 times and Benamar being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Onken winning 2 and Benamar winning 0. The last match between Onken and Benamar was at the Morocco F2, 14-03-2016, Q2 round, Clay with Julian Onken getting the victory 6-4 7-6(0).
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Onken and Benamar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Onken winning 0 times and Benamar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Onken winning 1, and Benamar 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Onken has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Benamar has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Onken has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Benamar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Onken has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Benamar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)